#BTSpeakingOut – It’s either right or wrong

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the author(s) do not represent the official position of Barbados TODAY. 

by Patrick Gittens

Your newspaper is doing a disservice to the development of critical legal assessment when one of your reporters can publish the views of one lawyer criticising another lawyer in terms such as “RUBBISH”!

In addition, I do not understand what is being achieved by the continual description of “constitutional law expert”; a legal position is either sound or it is not sound even if it comes from a non-lawyer.

Section 35 is written in very unambiguous ENGLISH… “there shall be a Parliament of Barbados which SHALL consist of…….”

There cannot therefore be an “opening” of something that does not yet exist!

I am advised that Section 50 (2) is being invoked in the process of supporting this action; for the avoidance of doubt, Section 50 deals with “the regulation of proceedings in Parliament”, that section is only operative where there IS a Parliament that has been legally constituted!

This country has really lost its way when that advice can be given to a Government; it is perverse!

Related posts

A November toast to the Republic of Barbados

Too much red on we flag

Stop bleeding consumers at the pump

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy Policy