Home ยป Posts ยป CCJ slams magistrate, appeal justices as woman wins landmark abuse case

CCJ slams magistrate, appeal justices as woman wins landmark abuse case

by Emmanuel Joseph
3 min read
A+A-
Reset

By Emmanuel Joseph

The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) has delivered a scathing rebuke to a magistrate and the Court of Appeal here over their handling of a womanโ€™s plea for a domestic protection order against her ex-partner with whom she shares a child.

Roxann Rachel Goddard took her case to the CCJ after local courts denied her a protection order against Abdul Aziz Akojee.

In a landmark, 269-page ruling that is certain to strengthen the protection of battered spouses and partners, the CCJ, the nationโ€™s final appeal court, ruled in favour of the woman who challenged the Court of Appealโ€™s decision, which upheld the magistrateโ€™s dismissal of her application for protection under the Domestic Violence (Protection Orders) Act. The justices also suggested that Caribbean governments set up special courts to handle domestic violence cases.

The CCJ chided the magistrate and the majority of the Court of Appeal for placing weight on the way Goddard had responded as a layperson about whether she belonged to the categories of โ€œspouseโ€, โ€œcohabitational relationship,โ€ โ€œdomestic relationship,โ€ or โ€œvisiting relationshipโ€ as defined by law.

โ€œThe approach of the magistrate and of the majority of the Court of Appeal is to be deprecated,โ€ the CCJ justices declared as they overturned the Barbadian courtsโ€™ decisions regarding the womanโ€™s plea for a domestic protection order against her former partner.

The CCJ said the magistrate and the appeal courtโ€™s majority both โ€œagreed that a protection order was not granted to the appellant because she โ€˜took herself out of the definitionโ€™ by saying to the Magistrate that she was โ€˜none of these thingsโ€™. It is regrettable that the magistrate should think that she had provided sufficient protection for the child by making an interim protection order for the child, but without making any order for the protection of the childโ€™s mother in these circumstances.โ€

The judges emphasized that Parliament could not have intended such a restrictive approach in interpreting the amended Domestic Violence Protection Order Act. โ€œSuch a narrow approach,โ€ the Caribbean tribunal added, โ€œwould leave the other exposed to the risk of violence without the realization that it was in the best interest of the child to protect the mother as well as the childโ€.

The CCJ reasoned: โ€œViewed through these lenses therefore, we arrive at the conclusion that the decision of the Magistrate upheld by the majority of the Court of Appeal that the appellant was not a โ€˜former spouseโ€™ withinโ€ฆthe amended Act, was wholly incorrect.โ€

The CCJ also ruled that imposing a time limit on an applicantโ€™s capacity to make an application for a protection order after a breakdown in a cohabitational relationship, as decided by the majority of the Court of Appeal, would run counter to the โ€œclear purposeโ€ and policy objectives of the amended Act. โ€œIn addition, to construe โ€˜former spouseโ€™ as limited by time without any specific provision to that effect contained in the legislation would give rise to an absurdity,โ€ the CCJ ruled.

In response to the appeal case, the CCJ called for the establishment of specialized problem-solving courts in the Caribbean to deal in a sensitive and holistic manner with gender-based and family violence matters. The court emphasized the necessity for comprehensive training and sensitization of judicial officers and court staff in handling domestic violence cases.

The CCJ expressed its gratitude to the charity Operation Safe Space Movement for Change Inc., along with the International Centre for Advocates Against Discrimination Inc. and the UN Women Multi-Country Office โ€“ Caribbean, for their โ€œinvaluable dataโ€, which significantly influenced the outcome of the case.

Attorney Lalu Hanuman for the appellant, Goddard, andย  Anika N, Jackson, and Jared K. Richards, were the lawyers for the lower courts in the name of the Attorney General. Anya A.A. Lorde contributed to the case as amicus curiae (friend of the court) on behalf of Operation Safe Space Movement for Change Inc (OSS), Leah Thompson also served as friend of the court, acting for UN Women.

emmanueljoseph@barbadostoday.bb

You may also like

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Accept Privacy Policy

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00