Home ยป Posts ยป Trump-Russia inquiry: President ‘did not conspire with Russia’

Trump-Russia inquiry: President ‘did not conspire with Russia’

by Barbados Today
3 min read
A+A-
Reset

BBC โ€“ President Trumpโ€™s campaign โ€œdid not conspireโ€ with Russia during the 2016 election campaign, Special Counsel Robert Muellerโ€™s report says.

A summary of Mr Muellerโ€™s report released on Sunday โ€œdid not draw a conclusionโ€ as to whether there was any obstruction of justice, either, whilst not exonerating the president.

However, the attorney general says this does not amount to an offence.

President Trump has consistently denied both allegations.

He has described the inquiry as a witch hunt.

The report is the culmination of two years of investigation by Mr Mueller.

What is in the report summary?

โ€œThe report outlines the Russian effort to influence the election and documents crimes committed,โ€ the letter by Attorney General William Barr to Congress says.

โ€œThe special counsel did not find that any US person or Trump campaign official conspired or knowingly co-ordinated with Russia.โ€

The second part of the report addresses the issue of obstruction of justice. Mr Barrโ€™s summary says the special counsel report โ€œultimately determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgementโ€.

It goes on: โ€œThe Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion โ€“ one way or the other โ€“ as to whether the examine conduct constituted obstruction.โ€

The letter then quotes directly from Mr Muellerโ€™s reportโ€ โ€œWhile this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.โ€

Mr Barr says that the evidence was not sufficient โ€œto establish that the president committed an obstruction-of-justice offenceโ€.

Mr Barr ends his letter to Congress by saying he will release more from the full report, but that some of the material is subject to restrictions.

โ€œGiven these restrictions, the schedule for processing the report depends in part on how quickly the Department can identify the [grand jury] material that by law cannot be made public.

โ€œI have requested the assistance of the Special Counsel in identifying all information contained in the report as quickly as possible.โ€

Mr Barr has been poring over the document since he received it on Friday.

What has the reaction been?

Congressman Jerry Nadler, the Democratic Chair of the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, emphasised that the attorney general did not rule out that Mr Trump may have obstructed justice.

โ€œBarr says that the president may have acted to obstruct justice, but that for an obstruction conviction, โ€˜the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conductโ€™.โ€

However White House press secretary Sarah Sanders described the findings of the report as โ€œa total and complete exoneration of the presidentโ€.

A good day for Trump

In his four-page letter to Congress, Attorney General William Barr summarises, mostly in his own words, the conclusions of the special counselโ€™s investigation. In one key line, however, he directly quotes the report.

โ€œThe investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or co-ordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.โ€

There, in Robert Muellerโ€™s own words, is the end result of nearly two years of work, 2,800 subpoenas, hundreds of search warrants and countless hours of interviews. There were โ€œmultiple offersโ€ of help from โ€œRussian-affiliated individualsโ€ to the Trump campaign, but they never took the bait.

There was, as Donald Trump might say, โ€œno collusionโ€. At least, no evidence of it was unearthed.

The obstruction of justice component is a murkier matter. The decision of whether to charge Mr Trump with interference with the various investigations wasnโ€™t Mr Muellerโ€™s. Saying it involved โ€œdifficult issuesโ€, the former FBI director punted.

Instead, Mr Barr โ€“ in consultation with Department of Justice staff โ€“ decided not to prosecute, in part because there was no apparent underlying crime to obstruct.

Make no mistake, today was a very good day for Mr Trump.

While a bevy of inquiries into his presidency will grind on, the shadow of Mr Muellerโ€™s investigation โ€“ hovering over the White House since May 2017 โ€“ has been lifted.

You may also like

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Accept Privacy Policy

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00