Local NewsTechnology Advocates debate social media limits on under-16s by Barbados Today 07/12/2024 written by Barbados Today 07/12/2024 3 min read A+A- Reset Spokesperson for the Group of Concerned Parents of Barbados, Paula-Ann Moore, President, Barbados Youth Development Council Caleb Brathwaite and acting Principal Springer Memorial School June Moe. FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappEmail 1.8K Australiaโs landmark legislation banning social media access for under-16s has ignited intense debate here, leaving figures, parental and youth rights campaigners divided over the potential implementation of similar restrictions locally. The world-first law, passed by Australiaโs parliament on November 28, mandates tech companies to prevent underage users from accessing social media platforms or face fines approaching AUD$50 million ($64.5 million). Prime Minister Anthony Albanese argues the legislation is crucial for protecting young people from social mediaโs potential harms. Paula-Ann Moore, spokesperson for the Group of Concerned Parents of Barbados, believes the government should stage a national debate to weigh the pros and cons of implementing such a law here. โThis type of regulation can be seen as reinforcement of the parental role and the parental responsibility because obviously itโs not meant to be a replacement of that responsibility,โ Moore said. She pointed out that a ban on social media for children under 16 raises concerns about balancing parental responsibilities and government intervention. โThe dangers of social media and access to the internet. And I think the younger that children are exposed to it, the greater the risk that they may fall victim to whether itโs predators, of course, the access to porn is a huge factor,โ she added. You Might Be Interested In CaribNOG Internet conference commences this week in Barbados ASYCUDA Worldโs implementation postponed until Sep 9 Smart Barbados Week launches Monday Moore also cited research linking social media use to negative impacts on mental health: โThen all of what weโve seen, the data and the research have come out on how those social media platforms can impact negatively on childrenโs self-esteem, fear of missing out, anxiety, and unfortunately cyberbullying thatโs also a great risk as well.โ June Moe, acting principal of Springer Memorial Secondary School, applauded Australiaโs decision and emphasised the dangers of unregulated screen time. ย โAs educators, we see firsthand the dangers that increased screen time, exposure to platforms that are not monitored. We see the dangers daily that it has on students under 16,โ Moe said. She praised Australiaโs proactive approach: โI applaud Australia for removing devices for children whose minds are not yet fully developed. These devices not only promote a sedentary lifestyle but also lead to an anti-social one.โ The principal noted that while children may appear social online, they often struggle with interpersonal interactions. โYounger persons have lost the ability to engage one-on-one or in small groups because theyโre accustomed to interacting with a screen.โ Moe urged parents to become more informed and involved. โParents are the ones providing the devices. I urge them to read, research, and understand the dangers of excessive screen time. Many platforms expose children to harmful situations, from psychological harm to meeting strangers with dangerous intentions,โ she said. But youth advocate Caleb Brathwaite opposed the idea of a ban while insisting on greater parental control instead. Brathwaite, the president of the Barbados Youth Development Council (BYDC), said: โThere should be more parental controlโฆ greater rules in terms of monitoring their childrenโs use of social media, as well as educating them of the correct use of social media, and also to see how that information technology being taught within the educational system can also play that role, so that it is constant, and that is the correct use of social media.โ He argued that age restrictions already exist on most platforms and suggested that additional rules may not be necessary. While Moore believes the idea of enforcing a similar ban has merit, she noted significant challenges. She said: โFor you to implement the age limit and then enforce it, thereโs certain data that you would have to provide. So, the argument could be made, I think, with some success, but if already weโre having data breaches on several different elements of our life, do we wait, until we have some assurance that we are ready from a technological point of view, to ensure that those data breaches are minimised, are we even ready?โ louriannegraham@barbadostoday.bb ย ย Barbados Today Stay informed and engaged with our digital news platform. The leading online multimedia news resource in Barbados for news you can trust. You may also like Tridents Women clinch thrilling three-run WCPL win 12/09/2026 Nelson Street man denies wounding charge 12/09/2026 โNo more welfare gaps during reviewsโ 12/09/2026