Court Judge issues juror badges to prevent improper communication by Jenique Belgrave 05/06/2025 written by Jenique Belgrave Updated by Barbados Today 05/06/2025 1 min read A+A- Reset The badges will distinguish empanelled jurors from other members of the public. Share FacebookTwitterLinkedinWhatsappEmail 418 Just days after calling for a way to distinguish empanelled jurors from others around the courts, a High Court judge has implemented the use of identifying badges for jurors in the No. 5 Supreme Court. On Monday, while addressing a new cohort of jurors, Madam Justice Pamela Beckles reminded them that once empanelled, they were prohibited from discussing the case, either among themselves or with anyone else, and must not allow others to approach them for that purpose either. However, she noted that distinguishing jurors from accused persons, witnesses, attorneys, and others who often gather outside the courtroom was challenging, raising the risk of improper or inadvertent communication that could compromise the administration of justice. At that time, Justice Beckles stated: “I know in other parts of the world it is done, so this is not original to me. It is not my invention, but I think we should consider having juror badges created for empanelled jurors. “It is my thinking that if these badges are worn at all times by the empanelled jurors and are visible to everyone around, then this would ensure that witnesses, parties and attorneys do not inadvertently talk to you. It would be imperative that you wear your juror badge at all times in the courtroom and its environs, even the canteen. Wearing your juror badge at all times will alert people near you that they must stop talking about the case.” On Wednesday, following the empanelling of a nine-member jury, each juror was issued a badge and instructed to wear it whenever within the court precincts. You Might Be Interested In Alleged burglar remanded Crime spree Francis to undergo assessment Justice Beckles expressed hope that the measure would help prevent any improprieties arising from unintended communication. Jenique Belgrave You may also like Vonda Pile can no longer practise law in Barbados 16/06/2025 First-time visitor fined $80 000 for importing drugs 13/06/2025 Don’t come back, judge tells Guyanese drug traffickers 07/06/2025